From hellosticky at gmail.com Tue Sep 2 04:38:03 2008 From: hellosticky at gmail.com (KE) Date: Tue Sep 2 04:38:52 2008 Subject: Running in mono? Message-ID: <48bcfb94.1d3e400a.7af5.779a@mx.google.com> Hi, is this project different from SharpSvn (http://sharpsvn.open.collab.net/) in that it can run under Mono? Does Svn.Net still only use PInvoke? Thanks, From toby at etjohnson.us Tue Sep 2 11:14:17 2008 From: toby at etjohnson.us (toby@etjohnson.us) Date: Tue Sep 2 11:14:31 2008 Subject: Running in mono? In-Reply-To: <48bcfb94.1d3e400a.7af5.779a@mx.google.com> References: <48bcfb94.1d3e400a.7af5.779a@mx.google.com> Message-ID: Hello KE, This project *should* run under Mono. When I copied the project from SubversionSharp (which was and is .NET/Mono 1.x only) it was working under Mono. It does use P/Invoke, which should work under both Mono and .NET as long as the shared library is found. Since copying the project, I have not consistently tested in Mono although I did make a conscious effort to avoid any platform-specific code (or use appropriate platform-specific calls such as the various System.Environment calls). The build scripts are NAnt which also runs in Mono. That said, if there are any errors in using the library with Mono we would appreciate patches. Toby On Tue, 2 Sep 2008 04:38:03 -0400, "KE" wrote: > Hi, is this project different from SharpSvn > (http://sharpsvn.open.collab.net/) in that it can run under Mono? Does > Svn.Net still only use PInvoke? > Thanks, > > _______________________________________________ > svndotnet-users mailing list > Project homepage: > http://www.pumacode.org/projects/svndotnet/ > Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Admin: > http://lists.pumacode.org/mailman/listinfo/svndotnet-users-lists.pumacode.org From neonic at gmail.com Mon Sep 8 18:47:31 2008 From: neonic at gmail.com (Neonic) Date: Mon Sep 8 18:47:37 2008 Subject: Basic authentication Message-ID: <413a1b610809081547g5ae524e6uc0724ddb1e31b352@mail.gmail.com> Hi, Still new to this whole SvnDotNet library, and I've figured out how to do most things, but now I came across something that seems like it should be relatively easy to do, but I skipped over it as a time saver. When I first set up my subversion server I had it hosted locally, behind my NAT so no one but me could get to it, so I just had a no authentication... It was open without a username or password required. Now, however, I have my Subversion server professionally hosted and I need to know how to supply the authentication information to the SvnClient object. Thanks for your help, - Mick -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.pumacode.org/pipermail/svndotnet-users-lists.pumacode.org/attachments/20080908/29602e75/attachment.html From bradstiles at bellsouth.net Wed Sep 17 15:26:28 2008 From: bradstiles at bellsouth.net (Brad Stiles) Date: Wed Sep 17 15:26:37 2008 Subject: No subject Message-ID: <091720081926.19142.48D159E4000686C500004AC622230703729B0A02D2089B9A019C04040A0DBF9C0A04079B9C0B0E9D0D@att.net> Toby, I know you derived this project from another, but what one was it? Was it by any chance the one that is now SharpSvn (http://sharpsvn.open.collab.net), which is used by AnkSVN? Brad From toby at etjohnson.us Wed Sep 17 15:38:52 2008 From: toby at etjohnson.us (Toby Johnson) Date: Wed Sep 17 15:39:08 2008 Subject: SvnDotNet In-Reply-To: <091720081926.19142.48D159E4000686C500004AC622230703729B0A02D2089B9A019C04040A0DBF9C0A04079B9C0B0E9D0D@att.net> References: <091720081926.19142.48D159E4000686C500004AC622230703729B0A02D2089B9A019C04040A0DBF9C0A04079B9C0B0E9D0D@att.net> Message-ID: <48D15CCC.6030204@etjohnson.us> No, I believe SharpSvn is a re-implementation of the library in C#. I based mine off SubversionSharp, which was a .NET 1.x-only wrapper around the actual svn client lib. Of course all of this is explained at the very top of the project's home page, n00b :) toby Brad Stiles wrote: > Toby, > > I know you derived this project from another, but what one was it? Was it by any chance the one that is now SharpSvn (http://sharpsvn.open.collab.net), which is used by AnkSVN? > > Brad > > _______________________________________________ > svndotnet-users mailing list > Project homepage: > http://www.pumacode.org/projects/svndotnet/ > Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Admin: > http://lists.pumacode.org/mailman/listinfo/svndotnet-users-lists.pumacode.org > > From bradstiles at bellsouth.net Wed Sep 17 19:45:56 2008 From: bradstiles at bellsouth.net (Brad Stiles) Date: Wed Sep 17 19:46:04 2008 Subject: SvnDotNet In-Reply-To: <48D15CCC.6030204@etjohnson.us> References: <091720081926.19142.48D159E4000686C500004AC622230703729B0A02D2089B9A019C04040A0DBF9C0A04079B9C0B0E9D0D@att.net> <48D15CCC.6030204@etjohnson.us> Message-ID: <002101c9191f$885f5740$991e05c0$@net> > No, I believe SharpSvn is a re-implementation of the library in C#. I > based mine off SubversionSharp, which was a .NET 1.x-only wrapper > around the actual svn client lib. Of course all of this is explained > at the very top of the project's home page, n00b :) Uh, I didn't have any emails in my in-box that had the home page in it, only the address in my address book. Yeah, that's the ticket. Anyway, a certain "architect" is pushing again for Team Foundation Server cuz what we have is crap, naturally, so I'm trying to rebuild the build system to be more user friendly. Something about making sure every last entry is correct in the tiniest detail is upsetting folks, not to mention hard to understand for certain people, so I'm gonna try to make it point and click, and foolproof enough so that even the stupidest person can hit a button and deploy flawlessly. I'm certain the universe will be better at breeding fools than I am in thwarting them, but I gotta try. Anyway, part of that effort is writing a couple of tasks for the Subversion operations, and I was wondering how the two libraries compared. Brad From maxim.va at gmail.com Thu Sep 18 10:09:40 2008 From: maxim.va at gmail.com (Maxim Abrashkin) Date: Thu Sep 18 10:09:48 2008 Subject: SvnDotNet In-Reply-To: <48D15CCC.6030204@etjohnson.us> References: <091720081926.19142.48D159E4000686C500004AC622230703729B0A02D2089B9A019C04040A0DBF9C0A04079B9C0B0E9D0D@att.net> <48D15CCC.6030204@etjohnson.us> Message-ID: <9093a1820809180709x72c0c14blc0a1fecb812250d4@mail.gmail.com> Hello. Small correction: SharpSvn written in managed c++, not c#. And has nothing common with SvnDotNot and SubversionSharp libraries. And as I think correctly it can work only on win32 platform. On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 2:38 AM, Toby Johnson wrote: > No, I believe SharpSvn is a re-implementation of the library in C#. I based > mine off SubversionSharp, which was a .NET 1.x-only wrapper around the > actual svn client lib. Of course all of this is explained at the very top of > the project's home page, n00b :) > > toby > > Brad Stiles wrote: > >> Toby, >> >> I know you derived this project from another, but what one was it? Was it >> by any chance the one that is now SharpSvn ( >> http://sharpsvn.open.collab.net), which is used by AnkSVN? >> Brad >> > -- Maxim -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.pumacode.org/pipermail/svndotnet-users-lists.pumacode.org/attachments/20080918/96d24aa6/attachment.html From hellosticky at gmail.com Thu Sep 18 13:09:47 2008 From: hellosticky at gmail.com (eydelber) Date: Thu Sep 18 13:09:59 2008 Subject: SvnDotNet In-Reply-To: <9093a1820809180709x72c0c14blc0a1fecb812250d4@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <48d28b5f.1b17400a.0c9a.ffffd6f3@mx.google.com> SharpSvn cannot be used on Linux with Mono; however, as I understand it, SubversionSharp does not implement Subversion 1.5, correct? _____ From: svndotnet-users-bounces@lists.pumacode.org [mailto:svndotnet-users-bounces@lists.pumacode.org] On Behalf Of Maxim Abrashkin Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2008 10:10 AM To: SvnDotNet Users Subject: Re: SvnDotNet Hello. Small correction: SharpSvn written in managed c++, not c#. And has nothing common with SvnDotNot and SubversionSharp libraries. And as I think correctly it can work only on win32 platform. On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 2:38 AM, Toby Johnson wrote: No, I believe SharpSvn is a re-implementation of the library in C#. I based mine off SubversionSharp, which was a .NET 1.x-only wrapper around the actual svn client lib. Of course all of this is explained at the very top of the project's home page, n00b :) toby Brad Stiles wrote: Toby, I know you derived this project from another, but what one was it? Was it by any chance the one that is now SharpSvn (http://sharpsvn.open.collab.net), which is used by AnkSVN? Brad -- Maxim -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.pumacode.org/pipermail/svndotnet-users-lists.pumacode.org/attachments/20080918/438ae0ee/attachment.html From maxim.va at gmail.com Fri Sep 19 12:08:46 2008 From: maxim.va at gmail.com (Maxim Abrashkin) Date: Fri Sep 19 12:08:53 2008 Subject: SvnDotNet In-Reply-To: <48d28b5f.1b17400a.0c9a.ffffd6f3@mx.google.com> References: <9093a1820809180709x72c0c14blc0a1fecb812250d4@mail.gmail.com> <48d28b5f.1b17400a.0c9a.ffffd6f3@mx.google.com> Message-ID: <9093a1820809190908y33517d75je5042e84c7672dac@mail.gmail.com> On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 12:09 AM, eydelber wrote: > SharpSvn cannot be used on Linux with Mono; however, as I understand it, > SubversionSharp does not implement Subversion 1.5, correct? > > Yes, new svn 1.5 features is not supported. But client libraries of the svn 1.5 can be used with SvnDotNet. -- Maxim -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.pumacode.org/pipermail/svndotnet-users-lists.pumacode.org/attachments/20080919/5ddda8ea/attachment.html