Invalid change ordering?

[Dirk]

> I think this discussion established that the middle two changes were 
> unnecessary. Indeed the comment #1 just above it says "we can use this 
> item name, since it was valid in that time" suggesting that when that 
> comment was written someone was aware the item could have been deleted.

Ok, I have thought about this a little longer, esp. in respect to the 2 
patched lines that regard projects, where the item is deleted, as non 
valid. As you state above, and also the comment in the code, this item 
pathes are valid. I would like to extend this: "they are valid, but not 
the best choice, if there are other non deleted pathes". So I would 
propose to first check for contexts, where the item is not deleted and 
if we can't find one, we will fall back to a deleted path.

Dirk