Issue getting application to built

[Toby Johnson]

Jan Hlavatý wrote:
> Alexander Gavrilov wrote:
>> Yes, SQLite 3 is available as DBD::SQLite. But I didn't see any 
>> noticeable
>> differences in performance: switching the DB to a ramdisk is a lot
>> more effective.
>> So the only argument for switching is that SQLite2 is sort of 
>> obsolete. On the
>> downside, it may bring hidden bugs, like the one in that hunk which 
>> adds '+0' to
>> a request to make it work.
>
> SQLite2 module fails the module test suite (crashes during test) on 
> win32 for me
> and wont install, anything is better than that.

Why are you building it on Windows? You should be able to just install 
the module from the ActiveState repository using ppm.

toby