From bshahadat at gmail.com Tue Feb 2 13:02:52 2010 From: bshahadat at gmail.com (Basma Shahadat) Date: Tue Feb 2 13:03:03 2010 Subject: Problem having to run an external job .. Message-ID: I ran the following: D:\BuildServer\tools\hudson\war\WEB-INF>java -classpath remoting.jar:../lib/hudson-core-1.337.jar hudson.Main "copyfile" d:\xfer\test.bat Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: hudson/Main Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: hudson.Main at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:200) at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:188) at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:306) at sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader.loadClass(Launcher.java:276) at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:251) at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClassInternal(ClassLoader.java:319) I do not have tomcat installation. Do I need to have it installed for running external jobs? From nathan-svn at spicycrypto.ca Tue Feb 2 13:09:08 2010 From: nathan-svn at spicycrypto.ca (Nathan Kidd) Date: Tue Feb 2 13:09:24 2010 Subject: Problem having to run an external job .. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4B686A44.10207@spicycrypto.ca> You've got the wrong list. On 10-02-02 01:02 PM, Basma Shahadat wrote: > I ran the following: > > D:\BuildServer\tools\hudson\war\WEB-INF>java -classpath > remoting.jar:../lib/hudson-core-1.337.jar hudson.Main "copyfile" > d:\xfer\test.bat > Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: hudson/Main > Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: hudson.Main > at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:200) > at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) > at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:188) > at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:306) > at sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader.loadClass(Launcher.java:276) > at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:251) > at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClassInternal(ClassLoader.java:319) > > I do not have tomcat installation. Do I need to have it installed for > running external jobs? > > _______________________________________________ > vss2svn-users mailing list > Project homepage: > http://www.pumacode.org/projects/vss2svn/ > Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Admin: > http://lists.pumacode.org/mailman/listinfo/vss2svn-users-lists.pumacode.org > Mailing list web interface (with searchable archives): > http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.subversion.vss2svn.user > > From bshahadat at gmail.com Wed Feb 3 12:11:39 2010 From: bshahadat at gmail.com (Basma Shahadat) Date: Wed Feb 3 12:11:46 2010 Subject: Questions related to running Analyze in VSS server Message-ID: Hello All, I am running Analyze.exe from the commandline, it pops up an Analyze Results window, at the bottom it says 100% complete, but Elapsed time keeps on changing. In the Window it says, Validaing the security system. How do I now it is complete? Thanks for your help. Basma -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.pumacode.org/pipermail/vss2svn-users-lists.pumacode.org/attachments/20100203/529718aa/attachment.html From toby at etjohnson.us Wed Feb 3 13:01:44 2010 From: toby at etjohnson.us (Toby Johnson) Date: Wed Feb 3 13:01:56 2010 Subject: Questions related to running Analyze in VSS server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: This is really a VSS question; this list is for vss2svn discussion. However if you are planning to migrate to SVN, I'd recommend trying it without running Analyze first. Sometimes it causes more harm than good. On Feb 3, 2010 12:11 PM, "Basma Shahadat" wrote: Hello All, I am running Analyze.exe from the commandline, it pops up an Analyze Results window, at the bottom it says 100% complete, but Elapsed time keeps on changing. In the Window it says, Validaing the security system. How do I now it is complete? Thanks for your help. Basma _______________________________________________ vss2svn-users mailing list Project homepage: http://www.pumacode.org/projects/vss2svn/ Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Admin: http://lists.pumacode.org/mailman/listinfo/vss2svn-users-lists.pumacode.org Mailing list web interface (with searchable archives): http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.subversion.vss2svn.user -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.pumacode.org/pipermail/vss2svn-users-lists.pumacode.org/attachments/20100203/8a41e84e/attachment.html From mark.cooke at siemens.com Thu Feb 4 02:28:09 2010 From: mark.cooke at siemens.com (Cooke, Mark) Date: Thu Feb 4 02:28:25 2010 Subject: Questions related to running Analyze in VSS server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <38E3A921A2B9FC46B02E566BDED7CF4E0270B1AA@oxfw0e1a.ww001.siemens.net> >> >> I am running Analyze.exe from the commandline, it pops >> up an Analyze Results window, at the bottom it says 100% >> complete, but Elapsed time keeps on changing. In the Window >> it says, Validaing the security system. >> >> How do I now it is complete? > > This is really a VSS question; this list is for vss2svn > discussion. However if you are planning to migrate to SVN, > I'd recommend trying it without running Analyze first. > Sometimes it causes more harm than good. > ...and if you are still using VSS... Why? Below are a few links to "interesting" articles about the issues with SourceSafe, there are plenty of modern, free alternatives and if you do choose subversion, then this list will help in converting what it can of your VSS data to svn (hence the name vss2svn): http://www.developsense.com/testing/VSSDefects.html http://www.highprogrammer.com/alan/windev/sourcesafe.html http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/archives/000660.html ...and this one from Microsoft themselves: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb509342(VS.80).aspx This site provides a "comparison tool" for various revision control systems (useful for finding names of other tools, not all free): http://versioncontrolblog.com/comparison/ From anumenon84 at gmail.com Sun Feb 14 20:26:22 2010 From: anumenon84 at gmail.com (Anu Menon) Date: Sun Feb 14 20:26:32 2010 Subject: VSS2SVN: Issues after migrating Message-ID: Hi, I was able to go through the entire process successfully (well, it didn't error out, & vss analyze ended successfully)-but I am facing some major issues: - Only 3 of the 6 projects migrated - *Many* files didn't migrate - I checked the logs of some files at random, and somehow, only history in 2004/2005 has been migrated. Later versions & corresponding history hasn't been migrated. - The 'orphaned' folder contains 1940 folders I need some direction on: - how to troubleshoot these issues? - any general reasons/things to look out for on why certain files etc don't migrate & how to fix them? Any help will be greatly appreciated! -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.pumacode.org/pipermail/vss2svn-users-lists.pumacode.org/attachments/20100214/91641db4/attachment.html From toby at etjohnson.us Sun Feb 14 22:48:18 2010 From: toby at etjohnson.us (Toby Johnson) Date: Sun Feb 14 22:48:27 2010 Subject: VSS2SVN: Issues after migrating In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Anu, Which version of the tool did you use? And did you run analyze on the database before migration? Often it's better to try it without running analyze first. Toby 2010/2/14 Anu Menon > Hi, > > I was able to go through the entire process successfully (well, it didn't > error out, & vss analyze ended successfully)-but I am facing some major > issues: > > - Only 3 of the 6 projects migrated > - *Many* files didn't migrate > - I checked the logs of some files at random, and somehow, only history in > 2004/2005 has been migrated. Later versions & corresponding history hasn't > been migrated. > - The 'orphaned' folder contains 1940 folders > > I need some direction on: > - how to troubleshoot these issues? > - any general reasons/things to look out for on why certain files etc don't > migrate & how to fix them? > > Any help will be greatly appreciated! > > > _______________________________________________ > vss2svn-users mailing list > Project homepage: > http://www.pumacode.org/projects/vss2svn/ > Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Admin > : > http://lists.pumacode.org/mailman/listinfo/vss2svn-users-lists.pumacode.org > Mailing list web interface (with searchable archives): > http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.subversion.vss2svn.user > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.pumacode.org/pipermail/vss2svn-users-lists.pumacode.org/attachments/20100214/66b71277/attachment.html From anumenon84 at gmail.com Tue Feb 16 21:14:26 2010 From: anumenon84 at gmail.com (Anu Menon) Date: Tue Feb 16 21:14:45 2010 Subject: VSS2SVN: Issues after migrating In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Toby- I downloaded the latest recommended version about a month or so back - I'm guessing that was the same as the current recommended version i.e *0.11.0 .* And yes, I did run analyze & repaired the database..Didn't try it before analyzing! Any other ideas or tips? Thanks! 2010/2/14 Toby Johnson > Anu, > > Which version of the tool did you use? And did you run analyze on the > database before migration? Often it's better to try it without running > analyze first. > > Toby > > 2010/2/14 Anu Menon > >> Hi, >> >> I was able to go through the entire process successfully (well, it didn't >> error out, & vss analyze ended successfully)-but I am facing some major >> issues: >> >> - Only 3 of the 6 projects migrated >> - *Many* files didn't migrate >> - I checked the logs of some files at random, and somehow, only history in >> 2004/2005 has been migrated. Later versions & corresponding history hasn't >> been migrated. >> - The 'orphaned' folder contains 1940 folders >> >> I need some direction on: >> - how to troubleshoot these issues? >> - any general reasons/things to look out for on why certain files etc >> don't migrate & how to fix them? >> >> Any help will be greatly appreciated! >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> vss2svn-users mailing list >> Project homepage: >> http://www.pumacode.org/projects/vss2svn/ >> Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Admin >> : >> >> http://lists.pumacode.org/mailman/listinfo/vss2svn-users-lists.pumacode.org >> Mailing list web interface (with searchable archives): >> http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.subversion.vss2svn.user >> > > > _______________________________________________ > vss2svn-users mailing list > Project homepage: > http://www.pumacode.org/projects/vss2svn/ > Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Admin > : > http://lists.pumacode.org/mailman/listinfo/vss2svn-users-lists.pumacode.org > Mailing list web interface (with searchable archives): > http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.subversion.vss2svn.user > -- -- Anu Menon -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.pumacode.org/pipermail/vss2svn-users-lists.pumacode.org/attachments/20100216/145e2143/attachment.html From leena.dabre at patni.com Wed Feb 17 01:44:20 2010 From: leena.dabre at patni.com (D'abre, Leena ( SBU-QDI )) Date: Wed Feb 17 01:44:34 2010 Subject: Latest version. Message-ID: <28957CEB9AB9DC4B8BD735C888F38034286AF50826@EXCHSPZMAIL.patni.com> Hi, Can we know the latest stable version of vss2svn. Thanks & Regards, Leena Dabre. QDI. Patni Computer Systems Ltd. Unit 62, SDF II, Seepz. Andheri(E), Mumbai 400 096 Tel: 9122 - 2829 1454 Ext. 5273 Link No: 9 - 601 - 1242 ________________________________ This e-mail message may contain proprietary, confidential or legally privileged information for the sole use of the person or entity to whom this message was originally addressed. Any review, e-transmission dissemination or other use of or taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error kindly delete this e-mail from your records. If it appears that this mail has been forwarded to you without proper authority, please notify us immediately at netadmin@patni.com and delete this mail. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.pumacode.org/pipermail/vss2svn-users-lists.pumacode.org/attachments/20100217/4ab3e855/attachment.html From toby at etjohnson.us Wed Feb 17 02:16:56 2010 From: toby at etjohnson.us (Toby Johnson) Date: Wed Feb 17 02:17:05 2010 Subject: VSS2SVN: Issues after migrating In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Anu, If you have a copy of the database from before you ran analyze, I would recommend trying that version. Otherwise your best bet may be to pull a Get Latest from VSS and check that in on top of the migrated version. Another option would be to search for other VSS-to-SVN converters which use the Microsoft API instead of the reverse-engineered converter from this project. Even though this project can usually produce more correct results, it may be that running analyze changes the structure enough to be unreadable. Toby 2010/2/16 Anu Menon > Toby- > > I downloaded the latest recommended version about a month or so back - I'm > guessing that was the same as the current recommended version i.e *0.11.0 > .* > > And yes, I did run analyze & repaired the database..Didn't try it before > analyzing! > > Any other ideas or tips? > > Thanks! > > 2010/2/14 Toby Johnson > > Anu, >> >> Which version of the tool did you use? And did you run analyze on the >> database before migration? Often it's better to try it without running >> analyze first. >> >> Toby >> >> 2010/2/14 Anu Menon >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I was able to go through the entire process successfully (well, it didn't >>> error out, & vss analyze ended successfully)-but I am facing some major >>> issues: >>> >>> - Only 3 of the 6 projects migrated >>> - *Many* files didn't migrate >>> - I checked the logs of some files at random, and somehow, only history >>> in 2004/2005 has been migrated. Later versions & corresponding history >>> hasn't been migrated. >>> - The 'orphaned' folder contains 1940 folders >>> >>> I need some direction on: >>> - how to troubleshoot these issues? >>> - any general reasons/things to look out for on why certain files etc >>> don't migrate & how to fix them? >>> >>> Any help will be greatly appreciated! >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> vss2svn-users mailing list >>> Project homepage: >>> http://www.pumacode.org/projects/vss2svn/ >>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Admin >>> : >>> >>> http://lists.pumacode.org/mailman/listinfo/vss2svn-users-lists.pumacode.org >>> Mailing list web interface (with searchable archives): >>> http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.subversion.vss2svn.user >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> vss2svn-users mailing list >> Project homepage: >> http://www.pumacode.org/projects/vss2svn/ >> Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Admin >> : >> >> http://lists.pumacode.org/mailman/listinfo/vss2svn-users-lists.pumacode.org >> Mailing list web interface (with searchable archives): >> http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.subversion.vss2svn.user >> > > > > -- > -- > Anu Menon > > _______________________________________________ > vss2svn-users mailing list > Project homepage: > http://www.pumacode.org/projects/vss2svn/ > Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Admin > : > http://lists.pumacode.org/mailman/listinfo/vss2svn-users-lists.pumacode.org > Mailing list web interface (with searchable archives): > http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.subversion.vss2svn.user > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.pumacode.org/pipermail/vss2svn-users-lists.pumacode.org/attachments/20100217/46f48b4f/attachment-0001.html From toby at etjohnson.us Wed Feb 17 02:17:35 2010 From: toby at etjohnson.us (Toby Johnson) Date: Wed Feb 17 02:17:44 2010 Subject: Latest version. In-Reply-To: <28957CEB9AB9DC4B8BD735C888F38034286AF50826@EXCHSPZMAIL.patni.com> References: <28957CEB9AB9DC4B8BD735C888F38034286AF50826@EXCHSPZMAIL.patni.com> Message-ID: 2010/2/17 D'abre, Leena ( SBU-QDI ) > Hi, > > > > Can we know the latest stable version of vss2svn. > The latest version is 0.11.0 which is linked from here: http://www.pumacode.org/projects/vss2svn/wiki/InstallingVss2Svn -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.pumacode.org/pipermail/vss2svn-users-lists.pumacode.org/attachments/20100217/b15063ae/attachment.html From anumenon84 at gmail.com Wed Feb 17 08:21:13 2010 From: anumenon84 at gmail.com (Anu Menon) Date: Wed Feb 17 08:21:41 2010 Subject: VSS2SVN: Issues after migrating In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Thanks for your help, Toby! I'm thinking of doing the 'get latest' from VSS and checking it in - and for critical projects, moving them to a separate VSS database (with history) & running this converter on them separately. If anyone else has any other suggestions, do let me know. I'm also curious if there are some general rules that prevent files from getting migrated - i.e. labelling or 'spaces' in project/file names etc.. 2010/2/17 Toby Johnson > Anu, > > If you have a copy of the database from before you ran analyze, I would > recommend trying that version. Otherwise your best bet may be to pull a Get > Latest from VSS and check that in on top of the migrated version. > > Another option would be to search for other VSS-to-SVN converters which use > the Microsoft API instead of the reverse-engineered converter from this > project. Even though this project can usually produce more correct results, > it may be that running analyze changes the structure enough to be > unreadable. > > Toby > > 2010/2/16 Anu Menon > > Toby- >> >> I downloaded the latest recommended version about a month or so back - I'm >> guessing that was the same as the current recommended version i.e *0.11.0 >> .* >> >> And yes, I did run analyze & repaired the database..Didn't try it before >> analyzing! >> >> Any other ideas or tips? >> >> Thanks! >> >> 2010/2/14 Toby Johnson >> >> Anu, >>> >>> Which version of the tool did you use? And did you run analyze on the >>> database before migration? Often it's better to try it without running >>> analyze first. >>> >>> Toby >>> >>> 2010/2/14 Anu Menon >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I was able to go through the entire process successfully (well, it >>>> didn't error out, & vss analyze ended successfully)-but I am facing some >>>> major issues: >>>> >>>> - Only 3 of the 6 projects migrated >>>> - *Many* files didn't migrate >>>> - I checked the logs of some files at random, and somehow, only history >>>> in 2004/2005 has been migrated. Later versions & corresponding history >>>> hasn't been migrated. >>>> - The 'orphaned' folder contains 1940 folders >>>> >>>> I need some direction on: >>>> - how to troubleshoot these issues? >>>> - any general reasons/things to look out for on why certain files etc >>>> don't migrate & how to fix them? >>>> >>>> Any help will be greatly appreciated! >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> vss2svn-users mailing list >>>> Project homepage: >>>> http://www.pumacode.org/projects/vss2svn/ >>>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Admin >>>> : >>>> >>>> http://lists.pumacode.org/mailman/listinfo/vss2svn-users-lists.pumacode.org >>>> Mailing list web interface (with searchable archives): >>>> http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.subversion.vss2svn.user >>>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> vss2svn-users mailing list >>> Project homepage: >>> http://www.pumacode.org/projects/vss2svn/ >>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Admin >>> : >>> >>> http://lists.pumacode.org/mailman/listinfo/vss2svn-users-lists.pumacode.org >>> Mailing list web interface (with searchable archives): >>> http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.subversion.vss2svn.user >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> -- >> Anu Menon >> >> _______________________________________________ >> vss2svn-users mailing list >> Project homepage: >> http://www.pumacode.org/projects/vss2svn/ >> Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Admin >> : >> >> http://lists.pumacode.org/mailman/listinfo/vss2svn-users-lists.pumacode.org >> Mailing list web interface (with searchable archives): >> http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.subversion.vss2svn.user >> > > > _______________________________________________ > vss2svn-users mailing list > Project homepage: > http://www.pumacode.org/projects/vss2svn/ > Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Admin > : > http://lists.pumacode.org/mailman/listinfo/vss2svn-users-lists.pumacode.org > Mailing list web interface (with searchable archives): > http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.subversion.vss2svn.user > -- -- Anu Menon -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.pumacode.org/pipermail/vss2svn-users-lists.pumacode.org/attachments/20100217/fb7a6ee2/attachment.html From nathan-svn at spicycrypto.ca Wed Feb 17 10:26:19 2010 From: nathan-svn at spicycrypto.ca (Nathan Kidd) Date: Wed Feb 17 10:26:34 2010 Subject: VSS2SVN: Issues after migrating In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4B7C0A9B.9050809@spicycrypto.ca> On 10-02-17 08:21 AM, Anu Menon wrote: > If anyone else has any other suggestions, do let me know. I'm also > curious if there are some general rules that prevent files from getting > migrated - i.e. labelling or 'spaces' in project/file names etc.. Since everyone's form of VSS corruption is different, the sad VSS-reality is you can end up in a situation like yours. Of course you could analyze the conversion process in depth, do a lot of stepping in the perl script and probably add in enough hacks particular to your repo to get a better conversion, it's just a matter of how much time you want to invest. The only word of advice I have is: if you're converting a source code database don't underestimate the value of having full "annotate" history in svn (or whatever scm you end up with in the end). When we converted from vss the vss repo history converted fine, but we failed to take into account that the vss repo itself had been made by a HEAD checkout from another vss repo at one point. On a semi-regular basis I'm trying to understand the full evolution of a piece of code (Tortoise Blame's "blame previous revision" rocks) but when I hit that "imported from other vss repository" wall I'm forced to open ssexp and go stabbing in the dark in vss history; lots of time wasted and pain. (Oh, I do have another word of advice: use git) :) -Nathan From toby at etjohnson.us Wed Feb 17 13:04:20 2010 From: toby at etjohnson.us (Toby Johnson) Date: Wed Feb 17 13:04:33 2010 Subject: VSS2SVN: Issues after migrating In-Reply-To: <4B7C0A9B.9050809@spicycrypto.ca> References: <4B7C0A9B.9050809@spicycrypto.ca> Message-ID: On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 10:26 AM, Nathan Kidd wrote: > On a semi-regular basis I'm trying to understand the full evolution of a > piece of code (Tortoise Blame's "blame previous revision" rocks) > I second that! > (Oh, I do have another word of advice: use git) :) > Just curious: are you using git-svn to perform git operations on an svn repo, or just using git directly? How big of a team are you using git with? I think it would make a lot of things much easier but my impression is also that it requires a better understanding of version control methods in general, and that's something that my team already struggles with plenty, even on a centralized setup like SVN. toby -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.pumacode.org/pipermail/vss2svn-users-lists.pumacode.org/attachments/20100217/496b6eae/attachment.html From nathan-svn at spicycrypto.ca Wed Feb 17 13:36:59 2010 From: nathan-svn at spicycrypto.ca (Nathan Kidd) Date: Wed Feb 17 13:37:09 2010 Subject: VSS2SVN: Issues after migrating In-Reply-To: References: <4B7C0A9B.9050809@spicycrypto.ca> Message-ID: <4B7C374B.3060600@spicycrypto.ca> On 10-02-17 01:04 PM, Toby Johnson wrote: > On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 10:26 AM, Nathan Kidd > (Oh, I do have another word of advice: use git) :) > > Just curious: are you using git-svn to perform git operations on an svn > repo, or just using git directly? How big of a team are you using git with? > > I think it would make a lot of things much easier but my impression is > also that it requires a better understanding of version control methods > in general, and that's something that my team already struggles with > plenty, even on a centralized setup like SVN. I'm using git-svn, mainly because I think your general impression is correct: It requires a bit deeper, or perhaps just different, understanding of version control, which is harder to sink in after years of vss + svn. We have ~20 devs on svn, and those who want to use git-svn on top. Git-svn adds a fair bit of complexity over plain git, but is well worth it. To me, git->svn is not as much a leap forward as vss->svn was, but it somewhere in that magnitude because of the power of local commits + 'git rebase -i'. If I were starting with a new team I would probably go with straight git. -Nathan From bshahadat at gmail.com Wed Feb 24 11:52:01 2010 From: bshahadat at gmail.com (Basma Shahadat) Date: Wed Feb 24 11:52:10 2010 Subject: How to use -label_mapper optipon in vss2svn commandline Message-ID: Hello, I would like to know in detailed what the following options work .. --trunkdir : Specify where to map the VSS Project Root in the converted repository (default = "/") --auto_props : Specify an autoprops ini file to use, e.g. --auto_props="c:/Dokumente und Einstellungen/user/Anwend ngsdaten/Subversion/config" --md5 : generate md5 checksums --label_mapper : INI style file to map labels to different locataions What is the format of ini file? Thanks Basma -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.pumacode.org/pipermail/vss2svn-users-lists.pumacode.org/attachments/20100224/f5c52843/attachment.html